Article content material

Native gun house owners are taking over arms in opposition to proposed federal legislation that will additional scale back the varieties of weapons allowed in Canada, and plenty of say harsher penalties for offenders are required as an alternative.

Article content material

“I’ve by no means seen any lengthy gun that could possibly be a self-loading, aiming and self-firing, limitless looking gun,” stated Ray Boilard, a Windsor resident and authorized gun proprietor who has hunted waterfowl for over 40 years. and enjoys taking pictures sports activities.

Article content material

“The weapons are usually not the issue. Armed criminals kill folks,” stated Boilard.

“We’d be in a greater place if the liberal authorities had spent half of the {dollars} it’s making an attempt to spend on confiscation of authorized weapons on extra severe crimes or harsher penalties for offenders.”

Whereas Boilard acknowledged there have been “a couple of remoted instances” the place folks used AR-15 assault-style rifles for mass taking pictures, “You possibly can’t cease crimes by taking the gun away from you.

Article content material

“You possibly can have all of the lengthy weapons and you may’t cease the criminals from getting the black market pistols they used to hold out all these armed robberies and automotive hijackings,” he stated.

The Canadian authorities launched Invoice C-21 on October 21, which outlawed sure weapons. Since then, authorities officers have proposed different modifications that, if handed, would ban many different firearms.

Critics, together with the Alberta authorities, declare that Canada plans to “fully ban authorized firearm possession” after the Liberals quietly add extra advisable weapons to the banned record; this was initially billed principally as handgun restrictions, not lengthy weapons.

The modifications would ban almost all varieties of Canadian semi-automatic firearms, together with these usually utilized in sport taking pictures, that are weapons that load a brand new bullet after every set off pull.

Article content material

Hunter Chris Profota stated he was “shocked” to see the record and types of weapons focused by the federal authorities in a sweeping modification to the federal Liberal invoice.

“It began out as a gun ban and all of a sudden became a mess of looking weapons,” stated Profota, a Chatham resident, lifetime hunter, and consultant of Weatherby Firearms, an American arms producer that sells weapons. throughout Canada.

Profota stated it lists a number of the manufacturers it represents, calling it “conventional looking fashion weapons,” together with the Mark V rifle, which has been imported into Canada since 1957, for instance.

Born right into a “looking household,” Profota informed his father that he first joined the hunt when he was 4 years outdated. He handed the custom on to his spouse and daughter.

Article content material

“We’re a household that hunts extra, does outside taking pictures,” he stated.

He worries that the proposed legislation contains numerous “secret weapons” that transcend semi-automatic weapons – one which reloads a brand new bullet after every pull of the set off.

Profota stated hunters use semi-automatic weapons to hunt geese.

“They’re too lengthy, not one thing a felony would use,” he stated. “The typical duck shotgun is one meter lengthy. So it is not a concealable weapon.

“For instance, there are numerous lengthy weapons used for deer looking or deer looking and they’re listed right here. And these are slide rifles, a really conventional trying gun that holds about 4 rounds within the journal, one bullet at a time. And a non-detachable journal.

Article content material

“There are additionally some single pictures,” he added concerning the itemizing. “So mainly whenever you transcend what Liberals counsel to most of the people, you analysis it. There are various looking fashion firearms on this record.

The legislative modification tabled by the liberal authorities in Could proposes to “ban a firearm that may be a rifle or shotgun able to semi-automatically discharging center-fired ammunition and designed to simply accept a removable journal. capability larger than 5 cartridges of the kind for which the firearm was initially designed.”

The 478-page modification proposes a nominal ban on extra Canadian firearms, together with the SKS, a Soviet-era designed surplus rifle lengthy utilized by Canadian sport shooters.

Article content material

“Fewer weapons means safer communities,” reads a federal assertion dated October 21, 2022. “This is the reason the Canadian Authorities is implementing a number of the strongest gun management measures in a technology.”

The federal government estimates there are 70 % extra handguns in Canada at present than in 2010.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau lately informed Postmedia Information that the federal government is listening to the hunters’ considerations.

“We’re listening to suggestions proper now to ensure we’re not seizing weapons which can be primarily looking weapons,” Trudeau stated.

However native MP Chris Lewis (Okay – Essex) is skeptical.

“I do not imagine a phrase that comes out of Trudeau’s mouth,” Lewis stated. “He continues to lie.

“Details, law-abiding Canadians do not kill folks. “They don’t have anything to do with intrusions and all the safety points,” he stated.

Article content material

“The actual cause Justin Trudeau and the Liberals introduced this up is as a result of they failed very, very expensively to cease unlawful handguns from crossing our borders.”

Lewis, who legally owns a gun, stated his workplace was “flooded” with folks calling him and asking him to cease “this crap”.

“It’s completely ridiculous to counsel for a second that law-abiding hunters, duck hunters, deer hunters, rabbit hunters are the basis and reason behind the issue,” Lewis stated.

“This authorities is… completely unaware. They don’t know what they’re speaking about and are taking away the rights of extraordinary Canadians.”

Profota argues that the federal government focuses on the mistaken section of society.

“I believe they need to go after the responsible facet,” he stated. “Those that personal these weapons are usually not criminals.

“They’re licensed, law-abiding gun house owners and the mass is focused for the few who break the legislation with firearms in cities,” he added.

“These folks did not undergo the method of getting a firearm license like we did. And we by no means broke the legislation.

“In the event that they need to concentrate on one thing, concentrate on the unlawful facet of firearms, not the authorized facet.”

— with information from the Nationwide Put up

jkotsis@postmedia.com

twitter.com/KotsisStar